Browse Trading

Win/Loss Ratio

Win/loss ratio compares the number of winning trades with the number of losing trades over a defined sample.

The win/loss ratio compares the number of winning trades with the number of losing trades over a defined sample. It answers how many wins occurred for each loss, but it does not show the dollar size of those wins or losses.

Win/loss ratio is useful for trade review, but it should be paired with average win, average loss, position size, costs, and drawdown. A strategy can have more wins than losses and still lose money.

Basic Formula

1win/loss ratio = number of winning trades / number of losing trades

If a strategy has 30 winning trades and 20 losing trades, the win/loss ratio is 1.5. That means there were 1.5 winning trades for every losing trade in the sample.

Example

StrategyWinsLossesWin/loss ratioAverage winAverage loss
High-frequency small wins75253.0$20$90
Lower-frequency larger wins35650.54$220$60

The first strategy wins much more often, but each loss is large relative to each win. The second strategy loses more often, but a few larger wins may offset many smaller losses. The ratio needs payoff context.

Win/Loss Ratio vs. Win Rate

MetricFormulaBest use
Win ratewins / total tradesPercentage of trades that were gains
Win/loss ratiowins / lossesFrequency of wins relative to losses
Average win/lossaverage gain / average lossPayoff size comparison
Expected valueprobability-weighted average resultCombining frequency and payoff

What To Verify

  • whether breakeven trades are included, excluded, or classified separately
  • whether the sample size is large enough to matter
  • whether costs and slippage are included
  • whether trades are equally weighted or weighted by dollars at risk
  • whether open positions are excluded or marked consistently
  • whether the strategy changed during the measurement period

Common Mistakes

  • Treating a ratio above 1.0 as automatically strong.
  • Ignoring the average size of winning and losing trades.
  • Comparing strategies with different position sizes and holding periods.
  • Counting partial exits inconsistently.
  • Letting one period of favorable market conditions define the strategy.
Revised on Sunday, June 21, 2026