Accounting-profit return measure used as a simple capital-budgeting screen, but weaker than discounted cash-flow metrics for major investments.
The accounting rate of return (ARR) compares expected accounting profit with the investment required for a project or asset. It is simple, familiar, and easy to explain, but it is not a discounted cash-flow metric.
ARR can be useful as a quick internal screen. It becomes risky when it replaces Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and cash-flow scenario analysis for major capital decisions.
A common version is:
Some companies use average investment instead:
That policy choice matters. ARR is not as standardized as NPV, so the analyst should always state the denominator being used.
ARR measures accounting profitability relative to invested capital. It usually starts from accrual accounting profit after depreciation, not cash flow.
| Component | Typical Source | Analyst Check |
|---|---|---|
| Average annual accounting profit | Forecast income statement or management budget. | Does it include depreciation, tax, and allocated overhead consistently? |
| Initial investment | Capital request, fixed-asset budget, or project model. | Does it include installation, working capital, and required startup costs? |
| Average investment | Average book value over the project life. | Is salvage value or residual book value included? |
Because ARR uses accounting profit, it can move when depreciation policy, capitalization policy, or overhead allocation changes even if project cash economics are unchanged.
Suppose a project requires an initial investment of $200,000 and is expected to generate average annual accounting profit of $30,000.
The project has an accounting rate of return of 15% under the initial-investment version.
If the same company uses average investment and the average book value is $120,000, the ARR becomes:
The project did not change. The reported ARR changed because the denominator changed.
ARR answers a different question from discounted cash-flow metrics.
| Metric | Main Question | Uses Time Value Of Money? | Main Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARR | How much accounting profit is earned relative to investment? | No | Can be distorted by accounting policy and timing. |
| NPV | How much value is created at the required return? | Yes | Sensitive to forecast and discount-rate assumptions. |
| IRR | What return rate is implied by the cash flows? | Yes | Can mislead with scale, timing, and reinvestment assumptions. |
| MIRR | What return rate results using explicit finance and reinvestment rates? | Yes | Depends on the chosen rates. |
ARR is easy to compute, but it usually should sit below NPV in the decision hierarchy for long-lived projects.
ARR can be useful when:
ARR is weakest when cash-flow timing, working capital, tax, salvage value, or project duration is important.
Useful public sources can support accounting-profit and investment inputs for public-company comparisons:
Public filings can support benchmark context. A project ARR still depends on the internal forecast, accounting policy, capital budget, depreciation schedule, tax assumptions, and approval memo.
A project has a 22% ARR because depreciation is slow and accounting profit looks strong. The same project has negative NPV at the company’s 11% hurdle rate because most cash inflows arrive late and working capital is heavy.
Answer: ARR should not override NPV. The project may look profitable on an accounting basis while destroying value after timing, risk, and capital cost are considered.
ARR can mislead when:
The problem is not that ARR is useless. The problem is treating an accounting-profit ratio as if it were a cash-flow valuation metric.
Use accounting rate of return as a simple supplementary screen, not as the final investment rule. State the formula version, reconcile accounting profit to cash flow, and compare the result with NPV, IRR, hurdle rate, and project risk.
Before relying on ARR, document: