Non-Deliverable Swap (NDS)

A non-deliverable swap converts reference-currency swap cash flows into a deliverable settlement currency instead of paying the reference currency.

A non-deliverable swap (NDS) is an over-the-counter interest-rate or cross-currency swap in which amounts linked to a reference currency are converted and settled in another, deliverable currency. The reference-currency notional is used to calculate cash flows but is not itself delivered under the non-deliverable terms.

An NDS can contain a series of payment periods. That distinguishes it from a Non-Deliverable Forward, which generally settles one future exchange-rate difference.

Key Takeaways

  • The contract identifies a reference currency and a separate settlement currency.
  • Interest or cross-currency swap cash flows are calculated under the agreed rate terms, then converted using a specified FX fixing or fallback method.
  • The restricted or non-delivered reference-currency notional usually serves as a calculation amount rather than a principal payment.
  • An NDS can hedge rate or currency-linked cash flows when direct delivery is unavailable or impractical, but it can leave fixing, basis, convertibility, counterparty, liquidity, and model risks.
  • The exact payment formula comes from the confirmation and incorporated definitions; the label alone is not sufficient.
  • An NDS usually produces multiple settlements, whereas an NDF generally has one future settlement.
  • Settlement in USD or another deliverable currency does not eliminate reference-currency exposure because the payment still depends on reference rates and an FX conversion rule.
  • Quote direction is critical: a reference-currency amount may need to be divided by one fixing convention and multiplied under its inverse.

How an NDS Works

A typical transaction identifies:

  1. Reference currency: the currency in which a notional, benchmark, coupon, or other amount is defined.
  2. Settlement currency: the deliverable currency in which the calculated amount is paid.
  3. Swap legs: fixed, floating, or cross-currency payment terms.
  4. Calculation periods: reset, observation, valuation, and payment dates.
  5. FX fixing: the source and time used to convert a reference-currency amount.
  6. Fallbacks: procedures for a missing, delayed, disrupted, or unusable fixing.

At a payment date, the calculation agent determines the amount under each leg, applies any contractual netting, converts the relevant reference-currency amount, and produces a settlement-currency payment.

Settlement Formula

For a simple non-deliverable fixed-for-floating coupon period, first calculate the net amount in the reference currency:

$$ X_{ref} = N_{ref}\left(R_{receive}-R_{pay}\right)\alpha $$

If the FX fixing (Q) is stated as reference-currency units per one settlement-currency unit, the settlement amount is:

$$ C_{settle} = \frac{X_{ref}}{Q} $$

For an INR amount settled in USD, a fixing of 84.00 INR per USD requires division:

INR / (INR per USD) = USD

If the published fixing instead used USD per INR, the conversion operation would be different. The safest control is to write the units beside the number and confirm that they cancel to the settlement currency.

Simplified Payment Example

Consider a USD-settled non-deliverable interest-rate swap referencing an INR 100,000,000 notional for a 180-day period:

  • one leg pays a 6.5% fixed rate;
  • the other leg pays a 7.1% floating fixing;
  • the day-count fraction is simplified as 180/365;
  • the contract nets the two INR amounts; and
  • the valuation-date USD/INR fixing is 84.00 INR per USD.

From the perspective of the party receiving floating and paying fixed:

INR net amount = INR 100,000,000 x (7.1% - 6.5%) x 180/365

INR net amount = INR 295,890.41

If the contract converts INR into USD by dividing by the USD/INR fixing:

USD settlement = INR 295,890.41 / 84.00 = approximately USD 3,522.50

This example isolates one net coupon period and ignores discounting, payment delays, fees, rounding, collateral, tax, and disruption terms. A real confirmation controls the rate definitions, sign, fixing source, conversion formula, and settlement amount.

Fixing Sensitivity

Keep the positive INR 295,890.41 reference-currency amount unchanged and vary only the fixing:

INR per USD fixingUSD receipt
80.00USD 3,698.63
84.00USD 3,522.50
88.00USD 3,362.39

With this quotation direction, a higher INR-per-USD fixing produces a smaller USD receipt for the same positive INR amount. The direction reverses for a negative INR amount because the party would make, rather than receive, the USD settlement.

Three-Period Settlement Schedule

An NDS is normally analyzed across all payment periods, not from one coupon alone. Continue the example with three 180-day periods and assume each period uses the same INR 100 million notional and 6.50% fixed rate:

PeriodFloating fixingNet INR amountINR per USD fixingUSD settlement
17.10%+INR 295,890.4184.00+USD 3,522.50
26.20%-INR 147,945.2185.00-USD 1,740.53
37.00%+INR 246,575.3486.00+USD 2,867.16

The undiscounted net of these three settlements is approximately USD 4,649.13 received. That total is not the swap’s value at inception or its realized profit. Payments occur on different dates, collateral and funding can create additional cash flows, and the swap can have a positive or negative termination value between settlements.

Main NDS Structures

StructureReference cash flowsTypical settlement
Non-deliverable interest-rate swapFixed versus floating amounts tied to one reference-currency notionalNet amount converted into a deliverable currency
Non-deliverable basis swapTwo floating benchmarks or tenors tied to a reference currencyNet spread amount converted into the settlement currency
Non-deliverable cross-currency swapCash flows linked to notionals or rates in different currenciesReference-currency amounts converted rather than delivered

The structure may include multiple coupon payments and potentially principal-related amounts. It should not be assumed to follow a one-period forward payoff.

InstrumentNumber of cash-flow periodsIs the reference currency delivered?Main price or fixing
Non-deliverable swapUsually multipleGenerally no under the non-deliverable legInterest benchmarks, FX fixing, spreads, and swap terms
Non-deliverable forwardUsually one settlementNoContracted forward rate versus fixing rate
Cross-Currency SwapUsually multipleOften yes for principal and couponsTwo currency curves, basis, and contract rates
Foreign Exchange SwapNear and far principal exchangesYesNear rate and swap points

An NDS can be non-deliverable because of market convention, regulation, documentation, or operational design. Do not assume a currency is legally non-convertible in every transaction or jurisdiction merely because an offshore NDS market exists.

NDS vs. NDF: Do Not Reuse the Wrong Formula

An NDF generally compares one contracted forward rate with one future fixing and cash-settles the difference. A non-deliverable interest-rate swap instead calculates recurring fixed and floating coupons before converting the applicable amount into the settlement currency.

Applying an NDF payoff formula to an NDS can omit:

  • multiple reset and payment periods;
  • rate compounding or averaging;
  • fixed-versus-floating coupon netting;
  • changing notionals or amortization;
  • a separate FX fixing for each settlement;
  • accrued but unpaid coupons; and
  • early-termination value for all remaining periods.

The confirmation may also require gross calculation or separate conversion of amounts rather than the simple pre-conversion netting used in this article’s example.

Why Use a Non-Deliverable Swap?

An NDS can be used to:

  • hedge a series of reference-currency interest payments;
  • transform fixed and floating rate exposure without delivering the reference currency;
  • manage cross-currency cash flows where onshore delivery is constrained;
  • obtain offshore exposure to a reference-currency rate or basis; or
  • align a settlement process with available deliverable currencies.

The hedge may not match an onshore loan, bond, or operating exposure perfectly. Differences in benchmark, fixing source, reset date, notional, tenor, liquidity, and convertibility rules can create basis risk.

Settlement-Currency Proceeds May Not Close the Hedge

Suppose a contract produces a positive INR 10 million reference amount and converts it at 84.00 INR per USD. The USD settlement is:

INR 10,000,000 / 84.00 = USD 119,047.62

If the entity must then obtain INR to pay an underlying obligation but can convert those dollars at only 82.00 INR per USD, the proceeds buy:

USD 119,047.62 x 82.00 = INR 9,761,904.84

The entity is short approximately INR 238,095.16 before transaction costs. The difference arises because the contractual fixing and the rate actually available for converting the settlement proceeds are not the same. Market access restrictions can also prevent or delay conversion entirely.

This example does not imply that either rate is typical. It demonstrates why USD cash settlement and economic hedging of an INR obligation are separate steps.

Valuation and Pricing Inputs

Valuing an NDS may require:

  • projected fixed and floating cash flows;
  • reference-currency and settlement-currency discount curves;
  • spot and forward FX rates;
  • cross-currency basis;
  • contractual FX fixing methodology;
  • payment and valuation dates;
  • fallback and disruption provisions;
  • collateral and netting terms; and
  • counterparty credit and funding adjustments.

A current spot rate alone is not enough. Future cash flows and conversion amounts depend on multiple curves and contractual definitions.

Valuing a Known Settlement

Once a reference-currency coupon and its conversion fixing are known, a simplified present value in the settlement currency is:

$$ PV_{settle} = DF_{settle}\times\frac{X_{ref}}{Q} $$

where (DF_{settle}) discounts from the payment date and the quotation (Q) is reference-currency units per settlement-currency unit.

Before the rate and FX fixings are known, both components may be uncertain. Valuation then requires projected floating rates, forward FX or an equivalent multi-currency framework, basis, discounting, and any modeled interaction between the reference rate and exchange rate. Substituting today’s floating rate and spot FX for every future payment is not a reliable valuation method.

Valuation Reconciliation

For each payment period, a reviewer should be able to trace:

  1. opening reference-currency notional;
  2. fixed rate, floating fixing, spread, and day-count fraction;
  3. gross leg amounts and permitted netting;
  4. FX fixing source, timestamp, quotation units, and rounding;
  5. signed settlement-currency amount;
  6. payment date and discount factor;
  7. collateral, credit, and funding adjustments; and
  8. cumulative cash settlements and current termination value.

A spreadsheet that shows only a final USD amount is not sufficient evidence. The units and signs should be reproducible from the confirmation and independent source data.

Fixing and Disruption Risk

The fixing source is central because it converts a non-delivered amount into the settlement currency. Review:

  • benchmark administrator and rate identifier;
  • publication time, location, and valuation date;
  • quotation direction and units;
  • rounding and calculation-agent discretion;
  • temporary fallback source;
  • permanent cessation or benchmark replacement;
  • price-source disruption and market-closure provisions; and
  • effects of capital controls, convertibility changes, or settlement restrictions.

Two transactions referencing the same currency can settle differently if they use different fixings or fallback waterfalls.

If a fixing is unavailable, the economic outcome is not automatically the previous day’s rate or zero. The contract may specify an alternative source, postponed valuation, calculation-agent determination, or another disruption response. Operations teams should identify the fallback before the valuation date and avoid inventing a substitute after publication fails.

Risks and Limitations

  • Interest-rate risk: fixed and floating cash flows change in value as curves move.
  • FX fixing risk: the settlement amount depends on the specified conversion rate.
  • Basis risk: the contract’s offshore benchmark or fixing may not track the underlying exposure.
  • Convertibility and regulatory risk: market access and permitted settlement structures can change.
  • Counterparty credit risk: default can interrupt recurring payments and create replacement cost.
  • Collateral and liquidity risk: mark-to-market changes can require funding before maturity.
  • Model risk: thin curves, illiquid tenors, and fallback assumptions can materially affect valuation.
  • Operational risk: incorrect fixings, calendars, signs, or settlement instructions can create losses.
  • Legal, tax, and accounting risk: treatment depends on jurisdiction, documentation, and entity facts.
  • Wrong-way risk: counterparty credit quality can deteriorate when the NDS has become valuable to the other party.
  • Closeout risk: terminating a multi-period swap requires valuation of all remaining cash flows, not merely the next coupon.

Review Checklist

  1. Identify the reference currency, settlement currency, and quotation direction.
  2. Map each notional, leg, benchmark, spread, reset, and payment date.
  3. Confirm which amounts are netted before conversion.
  4. Verify the FX fixing source, time, date, units, and fallbacks.
  5. Match the contract to the exposure’s notional, benchmark, tenor, and cash-flow schedule.
  6. Validate curves, basis, discounting, collateral, and valuation assumptions.
  7. Review disruption, convertibility, termination, and close-out provisions.
  8. Reconcile calculated payments with confirmations and settlement records.
  9. Compare the contractual fixing with the conversion rate available for the underlying exposure.
  10. Stress-test rate moves, fixing gaps, delayed publication, market closure, collateral calls, and counterparty default.

Authoritative References

Knowledge Check

Loading quiz…

FAQs

Is an NDS the same as an NDF?

No. An NDF generally has one future settlement based on a contracted rate and a fixing. An NDS can contain multiple fixed, floating, or cross-currency swap cash flows that are converted into a deliverable settlement currency.

Does a non-deliverable swap exchange principal?

The reference-currency notional is generally a calculation amount rather than a delivered principal under the non-deliverable terms. Some structures can include principal-related settlement amounts, so the confirmation must be checked.

Why does the FX fixing matter?

The fixing converts a reference-currency amount into the settlement currency. Its source, timestamp, quote direction, and fallback rules can materially change the payment.

Does USD settlement remove currency risk?

No. The payment is made in USD or another deliverable currency, but its size can still depend on the reference-currency fixing, rates, basis, and contract terms.
  • Interest Rate Swap: The deliverable fixed-versus-floating structure whose rate mechanics may be adapted in an NDS.
  • Non-Deliverable Forward: A generally single-settlement contract that should not be confused with a multi-period NDS.
  • Forward Contract: A broader future-delivery agreement used for comparison with non-deliverable structures.
  • Cross-Currency Swap: A multi-currency swap that often physically exchanges principal and coupons.
  • Basis Risk: The risk that offshore contract terms do not track the underlying onshore exposure.
  • Counterparty Risk: The risk that a positive swap value or payment is not fully realized after default.
  • Liquidity: The ability to transact or replace the hedge without excessive cost or delay.

This article is for financial education only. Non-deliverable swaps can involve significant rate, currency, basis, fixing, counterparty, collateral, liquidity, model, operational, legal, regulatory, tax, and settlement risks. It does not provide individualized investment, derivatives, accounting, tax, legal, or hedging advice.

Browse Financial Instruments