An impaired loan has experienced credit deterioration that affects expected collection under the accounting or risk framework being applied.
An impaired loan has experienced credit deterioration that affects expected collection under the accounting or risk framework being applied. The term is not one universal status. Current U.S. GAAP uses the CECL expected-loss model for loans held for investment, while IFRS 9 defines a credit-impaired financial asset using evidence that events have harmed estimated future cash flows.
ASC Topic 326’s current expected credit losses methodology estimates expected credit losses on covered financial assets measured at amortized cost. The allowance for credit losses is updated using relevant historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts.
This means U.S. GAAP does not wait for a specific loan to cross an old “probable incurred loss” threshold before recognizing all credit loss. Loans sharing similar risk characteristics are generally evaluated collectively; assets that no longer share those characteristics can require individual evaluation. Older reports and contracts may still use “impaired loan” under legacy U.S. GAAP terminology, so the reporting period and policy matter.
IFRS 9 defines a financial asset as credit-impaired when one or more events have detrimentally affected estimated future cash flows. Evidence can include significant borrower financial difficulty, breach of contract, a concession related to financial difficulty, probable bankruptcy or reorganization, disappearance of an active market because of financial difficulty, or purchase or origination at a deep discount reflecting incurred credit losses.
IFRS 9’s expected credit loss stages and interest-revenue mechanics are framework-specific. A general reference to an “impaired loan” should not substitute for a documented IFRS 9 staging and measurement analysis.
No single indicator is conclusive in every framework. Relevant evidence can include:
Collateral can reduce expected loss without eliminating impairment. Recovery depends on value, lien priority, insurance, legal enforceability, selling costs, and time to collect.
A lender has a $1 million commercial loan. The borrower closes its main plant after losing a customer, forecasts show that scheduled cash flows cannot be met, and the lender expects to collect only $750,000 through operations and collateral. The next payment is only 20 days late.
The example shows why “impaired,” “past due,” “nonaccrual,” and “charged off” cannot be used interchangeably.
| Concept | Main purpose | Financial effect |
|---|---|---|
| Credit impairment | Identify deterioration under the relevant framework | Affects measurement, staging, disclosure, or interest recognition |
| Allowance for credit losses | Estimate expected uncollectible amounts | Reduces the net carrying amount or records a related liability |
| Provision for credit losses | Adjust the allowance during the period | Expense or benefit in earnings |
| Charge-off | Remove an amount considered uncollectible | Reduces the asset and related allowance |
| Recovery | Record cash collected after charge-off | Affects the allowance rollforward or earnings under policy |
An allowance is an estimate, not a separate pool of cash. A charge-off does not necessarily end collection rights or forgive the borrower’s legal obligation.
| Term | Primary question | Why it differs |
|---|---|---|
| Past-due loan | Is a required payment late? | Timing status can arise before measurable loss |
| Nonaccrual loan | Should accrual-basis interest recognition stop under the applicable bank-reporting policy? | Income recognition classification |
| Non-performing loan | Does the exposure meet serious-delinquency or unlikeliness-to-pay criteria? | Prudential or portfolio classification |
| Defaulted loan | Has a defined contractual, legal, regulatory, or model event occurred? | Trigger depends on purpose |
| Impaired or credit-impaired loan | Has credit deterioration affected expected cash flows under the accounting framework? | Accounting evidence and measurement govern |
| Bad loan | Informal label | Too imprecise for accounting or regulatory conclusions |
Accounting, regulatory, tax, and legal treatment depends on the entity, framework, facts, and jurisdiction. This article provides general financial education, not accounting, audit, legal, or investment advice.