Istisna is an Islamic sale contract for an asset to be manufactured or constructed to agreed specifications for future delivery at a predetermined price.
Istisna is an Islamic sale contract for an asset that will be manufactured or constructed according to agreed specifications and delivered in the future for a predetermined price. Payment can be made in advance, by installments or milestones, at completion, or under another agreed schedule. In bank financing, the institution may sell the completed asset to its customer while using a separate parallel istisna contract with a manufacturer or contractor.
Istisna is used when the subject asset does not yet exist in completed form and will be made to order. Examples can include a building, industrial equipment, vessel, infrastructure component, or other manufactured asset that can be defined by specifications.
The contract commonly states:
The asset is identified by specification rather than by selling an already completed, specifically designated item. The economic and Shariah analysis depends on the complete contract, not only its title.
The purchaser contracts directly with the manufacturer or builder. The seller undertakes to produce and deliver the specified asset for the agreed price.
An Islamic financial institution can enter two contracts:
flowchart LR
C["Customer / ultimate buyer"] -->|"Purchase price under first istisna"| B["Islamic financial institution as seller"]
B -->|"Separate purchase price under parallel istisna"| M["Manufacturer or contractor"]
M -->|"Builds and delivers specified asset"| B
B -->|"Delivers conforming asset"| C
The diagram is simplified. Delivery may occur directly from the contractor to the customer under the bank’s arrangements, but the contracts remain separate. The bank should not treat the customer’s obligation as legally dependent on the subcontractor contract unless the approved structure and law provide otherwise.
Parallel istisna is not a pure agency pass-through. The bank sells an asset and takes contractual responsibility to deliver it to the customer. If the contractor is late, insolvent, or produces a defective asset, the bank cannot assume that it is automatically excused from the first contract.
The bank therefore needs:
Poorly aligned contracts can leave the bank owing a customer delivery or damages while lacking an equivalent recovery from the contractor.
| Payment approach | Cash-flow effect | Main risk question |
|---|---|---|
| Full advance payment | Seller receives funding before production | How is non-completion or misuse of funds addressed? |
| Milestone or progress payments | Cash follows verified stages of work | Who certifies progress and what happens if work is defective? |
| Payment at completion | Seller carries more construction funding | Can the seller finance work in progress and buyer refusal risk? |
| Deferred customer installments | Customer pays after or through delivery | How are customer credit and asset-delivery obligations separated? |
Unlike salam, istisna payment need not universally be made in full at inception. The agreed schedule should match the approved structure and be recorded clearly rather than inferred from project practice.
An Islamic bank agrees to provide a customer with a custom production facility under istisna for a predetermined sale price of $12 million, deliverable in 18 months. The customer pays:
The bank separately enters a parallel istisna with a qualified contractor for $9.5 million using aligned technical specifications and milestone evidence.
1Customer contract price: $12.0 million
2Parallel contract price: $ 9.5 million
3Gross contractual difference: $ 2.5 million
The $2.5 million is not automatically profit. The bank may bear engineering review, legal, monitoring, funding, takaful or insurance, taxes, hedging, delay, defect, replacement-contractor, capital, and operating costs.
At month 10, the contractor becomes insolvent after receiving payments for verified work. The bank still owes the customer a conforming facility under the first istisna. It must enforce security, value usable work in progress, appoint a replacement, fund any cost overrun, and manage the delivery delay according to the contracts and approved Shariah structure.
This example shows why the bank bears real asset and completion exposure rather than merely passing cash between customer and contractor.
| Structure | Subject matter | Payment feature | Main distinction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Istisna | Asset to be manufactured or constructed | Flexible agreed schedule | Seller undertakes manufacture or construction to specification |
| Salam | Fungible goods delivered in future | Commonly requires full advance payment under the approved structure | Often used for standardized goods rather than made-to-order construction |
| Murabaha | Existing asset sold at disclosed cost plus agreed profit | Immediate or deferred sale price | Financier generally acquires an identifiable asset before resale |
| Ijarah | Right to use an asset | Rental payments | Lease rather than sale-for-manufacture |
| Conventional construction loan | Cash loan funding construction | Principal and interest repayment | Lender is not normally seller of the completed asset merely by lending |
These are high-level distinctions. Product structures vary, and a transaction may combine contracts. Qualified Shariah, legal, tax, and accounting review should address the actual documents and jurisdiction.
The Islamic Financial Services Board identifies both credit and market risks in istisna. Credit exposure can arise when amounts are billed to the customer. Market or price exposure can arise from unbilled work in progress. Completion risk can include failure to complete, delay, cost overruns, force majeure, and lack of qualified personnel or reliable subcontractors.
Important risks include:
This page is general financial education, not a fatwa or legal, Shariah, tax, accounting, engineering, investment, or transaction opinion. Qualified advisers and the institution’s approved governance process should review the actual structure.