Delivery Versus Payment (DVP)
Delivery versus payment links securities delivery with the corresponding funds transfer so one occurs only if the other occurs.
Netting, delivery-versus-payment, trade-settlement, and settlement-risk concepts used to evaluate final transfers.
Settlement finality and netting determine how gross obligations are reduced, when cash or assets are due, and when transfers become irrevocable under the applicable system rules. A matched or confirmed transaction is not necessarily settled, and a net position is not automatically a legally enforceable exposure amount.
Netting covers bilateral, multilateral, payment, position, novation, and close-out arrangements. Trade Settlement explains the transfer stage after securities execution and clearing. Delivery Versus Payment links securities and funds legs, while Settlement Risk covers principal, replacement-cost, liquidity, operational, and finality exposures.
Evaluate the gross obligations, enforceable net amount, settlement date, system, linked transfer legs, finality rule, liquidity need, and failure procedure. Legal, regulatory, accounting, tax, and capital conclusions require the governing agreements and jurisdiction-specific analysis.
Choose a subsection first. Deeper term pages live inside each subsection, which keeps large topic hubs readable.
Delivery versus payment links securities delivery with the corresponding funds transfer so one occurs only if the other occurs.
Netting offsets eligible payment, trade, or contract obligations so parties calculate or settle a smaller net amount.
Settlement risk is the risk that an expected transfer of cash, securities, or another asset does not complete as required.
Trade settlement completes a securities transaction by transferring the required cash and securities after execution and clearing.