International accounting standards governing financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure where jurisdictions adopt or permit them.
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS Accounting Standards) are accounting requirements developed and maintained by the International Accounting Standards Board for use where a jurisdiction requires or permits them. They govern recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure in general-purpose financial statements, but local laws and regulators determine which entities must apply them.
The term IFRS often refers to the full body of IFRS Accounting Standards rather than only standards whose names begin with the abbreviation IFRS.
| Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
| IFRS Standards | Standards issued by the IASB, such as IFRS 9, IFRS 15, IFRS 16, and IFRS 17. |
| IAS Standards | Standards issued by the IASB’s predecessor and retained by the IASB unless amended or replaced. |
| IFRIC and SIC Interpretations | Guidance addressing specified application questions under existing Standards. |
| Amendments | Changes to one or more Standards, often with their own effective dates and transition rules. |
Exposure drafts, discussion papers, agenda papers, illustrative examples, and educational materials can help readers understand a project or requirement. They do not all have the same authority as issued Standards and Interpretations.
Each jurisdiction decides whether and how IFRS Accounting Standards enter its reporting framework. A jurisdiction may:
The accounting framework stated in the financial statements and auditor’s report is stronger evidence than a company’s location or multinational status. A multinational group may use IFRS for consolidated reporting while some subsidiaries maintain local statutory records under another framework.
| Standard | Main subject |
|---|---|
| IFRS 9 | Classification and measurement of financial instruments, expected credit losses, and hedge accounting. |
| IFRS 10 | Control and preparation of consolidated financial statements. |
| IFRS 15 | Revenue from contracts with customers. |
| IFRS 16 | Identification and accounting for leases. |
| IFRS 17 | Recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of insurance contracts. |
| IAS 2 | Measurement and reporting of inventories. |
| IAS 7 | Statement of cash flows. |
| IAS 12 | Income taxes. |
| IAS 36 | Impairment of assets. |
This is only a selection. A transaction can require several Standards, and scope requirements determine which one governs.
An IFRS analysis should separate four questions:
An amount can be measured correctly yet still be presented in the wrong line item or supported by inadequate disclosure. Likewise, disclosure generally does not correct a recognition or measurement error.
Assume inventory has a cost of $100,000 and its net realizable value falls to $82,000. Under IAS 2, the entity writes the inventory down by $18,000 because inventory is measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value.
In the next period, market conditions improve and net realizable value rises to $94,000. If the circumstances causing the write-down no longer exist, the entity can reverse $12,000 of the prior write-down. The carrying amount becomes $94,000, not more than the original $100,000 cost.
This example illustrates why GAAP vs. IFRS comparisons require topic-level analysis. Under U.S. GAAP, inventory write-downs generally cannot be reversed, and the measurement rules also differ by inventory method.
IFRS 15 uses a five-step model for revenue from contracts with customers:
The five steps are a framework, not a shortcut. Contract enforceability, variable consideration, financing components, contract modifications, principal-agent judgments, and whether control transfers over time or at a point in time can materially change the result.
IFRS 9 classifies financial assets based on contractual cash-flow characteristics and the entity’s business model. Depending on those tests and applicable elections, measurement can be at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income, or fair value through profit or loss.
The expected credit loss model requires forward-looking impairment estimates for assets within scope. An analyst should examine changes in credit risk, scenario assumptions, overlays, write-offs, and loss-allowance reconciliations rather than treating the reported allowance as a mechanically certain amount.
IFRS can provide a common reporting language across markets, but comparability still requires analysis. Investors should consider:
A company can comply with IFRS while using estimates that later change. Compliance does not guarantee profitability, liquidity, solvency, fair market value, or future performance.
This page is educational and does not provide accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, tax, valuation, or investment advice.