The U.S. standard setter for accounting and financial reporting by state and local governmental entities that follow GAAP.
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the independent organization that establishes accounting and financial reporting standards for U.S. state and local governmental entities that follow generally accepted accounting principles. Its guidance is designed for the accountability, budgetary, service, and financing questions that make government reporting different from business reporting.
GASB develops standards for recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure in state and local governmental financial reports. It operates under the oversight of the Financial Accounting Foundation, which also oversees FASB.
Government reporting serves a broader accountability function than a profit-focused business report. Readers may need to assess whether public resources were raised and spent as authorized, whether current revenues covered current services, whether infrastructure and long-term obligations are sustainable, and whether financial burdens have shifted to future taxpayers.
The word government is not enough to determine the reporting framework. Identify the entity and jurisdiction first.
| Reporting entity | Primary U.S. standard setter |
|---|---|
| State, city, county, school district, or other state/local governmental entity | GASB |
| Federal department or federal reporting entity | Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) |
| Nongovernmental company or not-for-profit organization | FASB |
Some organizations require additional analysis. For example, a legally separate hospital, university, utility, or retirement system may be governmental or nongovernmental depending on its ownership, governance, and reporting-entity facts.
GASB Statement No. 34 established a reporting model that includes government-wide financial statements and fund financial statements for general-purpose governments. These views answer different questions.
| Reporting view | Main focus |
|---|---|
| Government-wide statements | The government’s overall economic resources, using the accrual basis, including capital assets and long-term liabilities. |
| Governmental fund statements | Near-term inflows, outflows, and spendable resources, generally using the modified accrual basis. |
| Proprietary fund statements | Business-type activities, generally using the economic resources measurement focus and accrual basis. |
| Fiduciary fund statements | Resources held in a fiduciary capacity rather than available for the government’s own programs. |
Because the measurement focus differs, fund balance is not the same as government-wide net position, and a governmental fund expenditure is not always the same as government-wide expense.
Assume a city pays $600,000 cash for a fire truck expected to provide service for 10 years. Ignore residual value and financing for this simplified example.
In a governmental fund, the city may report a $600,000 capital outlay expenditure in the acquisition year because the fund statements emphasize current financial resources. In the governmental activities column of the government-wide statements, the city generally capitalizes the truck and reports depreciation over its useful life. Straight-line depreciation would be $60,000 per year.
The reconciliation between the two statement sets explains why the fund reported a $600,000 expenditure while government-wide expense for the year may include only $60,000 of depreciation. Neither view is automatically wrong; each uses a different measurement focus to answer a different financial question.
GASB standards address more than fund accounting. Important areas include:
The applicable standard and effective date should be verified for the reporting period. A numbered GASB Statement may also have been amended by later pronouncements.
GASB uses public due process that can include research, stakeholder outreach, public meetings, preliminary views or other consultation documents, exposure drafts, comment letters, public hearings, redeliberation, and issuance of a final Statement. Concepts Statements explain objectives and foundational ideas but do not replace transaction-specific standards.
The Governmental Accounting Research System (GARS) organizes authoritative state and local governmental GAAP and related literature. Historical summaries are useful for context, but an accounting conclusion should be tied to the current authoritative guidance and its effective date.
Municipal bond investors, oversight bodies, taxpayers, and analysts may use GASB financial reports to examine:
Budget documents can add useful context, but an adopted budget is not a substitute for audited GAAP financial statements. The two documents can use different scopes and accounting bases.
This page is educational. Governmental accounting conclusions depend on entity classification, applicable law, current standards, transaction facts, and the reporting period.